www.healthy-kids.info

Home

Frequently Asked Qs

How Can You Help Me...?

Memo to Asthma Educators

For Health Professionals

Work/Family Programs

Need an Advocate?

Resources

About Ellie

Success Stories

Contact me

The benefits of disclosure and labeling of ingredients to individuals, to families and to society would be enormous.

  • It would give parents the opportunity to make informed and enlightened decisions about food and products

  • It would be a strong public health measure that would reduce environmental health threats, especially to children.

  • It would allow better identification of the relationships between sources of exposure and acute symptoms and chronic illnesses.

  • It would motivate manufacturers to see the marketing advantage of eliminating ingredients that are a threat to health and the environment.

  • It would save millions of health and education dollars now going to treat or compensate for preventable illnesses and disabilities.


Testimony in Support of the Pesticide Disclosure Act, 1997

A PARENT'S RIGHT TO KNOW
Testimony by Ellie Goldberg, adapted from a March 24, 1997 version submitted to the Massachusetts Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Agriculture in support of the (defeated) Massachusetts Citizens' Right to Know Act.

I am submitting this testimony in favor of The Massachusetts Citizens' Right to Know Act because I believe it offers an important advance in the protection of children from exposures to the harmful chemicals and other toxic ingredients that damage their health and sabotage their development.

I believe that no risk to a child is acceptable if it is avoidable.  Not providing information about ingredients in food and consumer products is a betrayal of the most basic principles of child protection.

I am convinced that the current conspiracy of silence about toxic ingredients condemns many infants and children to an unhealthy and uncertain future and wastes millions of health and education dollars spent to treat or compensate for preventable illnesses and disabilities. 

In September, 1996, the US Environmental Protection Agency published a new National Agenda to Protect Children's Health from Environmental Threats.

It challenged industry, government, health professionals and other interest groups to adopt and help to implement standards and policies that explicitly recognize the special vulnerability of children to toxic threats and the rights of parents to information that enables them to reduce toxic exposures.  The Massachusetts Right to Know Act would demonstrate a commitment to this agenda.

The need for specific information on ingredients is vital to the interests of children and their families.  The lack of information about ingredients in most consumer products means we can never know how many headaches, upset stomachs, nausea, rashes, mysterious leg cramps, dizzy spells, mood swings, anxiety attacks, temper tantrums, chronic rhinitis and sinusitis, cases of asthma, learning disabilities, emotional and behavior disorders, and other symptoms and conditions are caused by exposures to allergens, contaminants and toxic ingredients in food, cleaning supplies and disinfectants, perfumes, paints, pesticides, adhesives, air fresheners and room deodorizers. 

We do not know how many so-called colds, bronchitis, sore throats, pneumonia and other respiratory ailments that are automatically attributed to viruses may have started with chemical exposures we are not aware of. 

Without information about ingredients, parents and health professionals do not know the nature, frequency and intensity of these exposures nor do they recognize the source of illnesses.  And it is impossible to track the additive, synergistic, cumulative or multiple effects of these exposures.

We can only imagine the average young child on the average day at home, at school and at play and guess how many exposures to air fresheners or room deodorizers, disinfectants, perfume, scented soaps, disinfectants, carpet cleaning chemicals, pesticides, lawn care chemicals, adhesives, and solvent-based markers, dry-erase markers, and other common school supplies and art materials. 

We can only imagine the impact of the paradichlorobenzene, naphthalene, cresol, ethanol, xylene, formaldehyde, or isocyanates and other irritants, carcinogens and neurotoxic chemicals on that child's health, behavior, and learning potential. We can only try to calculate the chances of those lungs developing asthma

One consequence of the ignorance about chemical hazards is the growing problem of inhalant abuse among young adolescents. The most frightening aspect of the problem is that children who abuse inhalants are using common household products and school supplies in their homes, garages, classrooms and stores. 

These chemicals are subject to restriction and regulation to protect adults in the workplace but not children in the nursery or the classroom.

It is bad policy that public health officials are concerned about the intentional abuse of these products by children but not the intentional exposures of infants and children to these same products by uninformed parents and school personnel, ignorant of their dangers. 

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health's educational material about inhalants is explicit: Inhalants are poison. Inhaling these products causes brain, nerve, kidney and liver damage.  Symptoms are a runny nose, sniffling, coughing, irritated eyes, extreme mood swings, irritability, outbursts, nausea, loss of appetite, vomiting, and convulsions.  Death can result from one time use. (Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Substance Abuse Services.) 

The solution is simple: just as we routinely read food labels for nutrition information, parents and others responsible for children should be able to routinely screen food and other consumer products and materials for harmful ingredients.

The benefits to individuals, to families and to society would be enormous.

The disclosure and labeling of ingredients in consumer products

  • would give parents the opportunity to make informed and enlightened decisions about food and products

  • would be a strong public health measure that would reduce environmental health threats, especially to children.

  • would allow better identification of the relationships between sources of exposure and acute symptoms and chronic illnesses.

  • would motivate manufacturers to see the marketing advantage of eliminating ingredients that are a threat to health and the environment.

  • would save millions of health and education dollars now going to treat or compensate for preventable illnesses and disabilities.


ELLIE GOLDBERG, M.Ed. is an education and environmental health advocate for healthy children, safe schools and sustainable communities – clean water, clean air, clean energy and safe food. Inspired by the legacy of Rachel Carson, who taught that our health and security is intimately connected to the quality of our environment, Ellie is active in public health, environmental, educational and public policy organizations working to increase citizen engagement, government accountability and corporate responsibility on behalf of children and their healthy development. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ellie.Goldberg@gmail.com 

Thanks for your interest in Healthy Kids